For
physicists.

QM V is the scorecard. It collects everything PDT predicts into one place and pins each prediction to a number, an experiment and a sensitivity. The organising quantity is a single scale, Λ_Φ, the phase-locking scale, which sits around 1.2 TeV. From that scale you get the Standard Model gauge coupling ratios, a Higgs at 125 GeV with siblings at 290, 500 and 1 to 2 TeV, Higgs coupling deviations of one to five percent, an electroweak shift around 10⁻³, gravitational-wave dispersion at 10⁻¹⁵ to 10⁻¹², and interferometric coherence noise at 10⁻²¹ to 10⁻¹⁸. The theory stands or falls on those numbers. The paper says so, in plain language.

PTG I lays the foundation. Strip a manifold down to the bare minimum: a smooth scalar field (the phase), a cone of allowed transport directions at every point, and a torsion-free connection so you can differentiate. No metric, no curvature

Particles in PDT are not point-like. They are stable knots in the phase manifold. So where do forces come from? QM IV answers that. When one defect moves or wobbles, it disturbs the phase fields around it. Another defect feels that disturb

If QM I shows that the Schrödinger equation can be derived rather than postulated, QM II asks a much bigger question. Can the rest of physics, gravity, particles, the Standard Model gauge group, the Higgs, also fall out of the same four pha